PHYSICS: How does Life fit into the mathematics which describe the Universe?

Theoria Omnia

How does Life fit into the Mathematics which describe the Universe ?

    It seems appropriate (if controversial), to include the possibility that life is also a legitimate and ubiquitous part of the universe and has a place in the considerations of the 'Theory of Everything', the multitude of 'beliefs' notwithstanding. With reference to the Table below - The tentative placement of life at the t/s ratio position of t⁴/s⁴ implies an additional scalar motion, that of energy (t/s) applied to mass, that is, life = mass x energy, ( t⁴/s⁴ = t³/s³ x t/s). These mathematics imply that life has an additional degree of freedom of scalar motion (4) when compared with mass (3), and also that life's inherent energy equivalent is mc³ if Einstein's logic is carried past mass.

    The other part of life, that of the intangible working of mind or 'consciousness', has its theoretical position in the s/t ratio area, again with an additional degree of freedom above that of gravity, at s⁴/t⁴ which is also reciprocal to the physical part of life, t⁴/s⁴ as discussed above. The implication of the mathematics is that   life x consciousness = unity, which makes the organism whole, still an analogue of t/s and s/t as discussed in a previous post for the lower power indices of s and t which are electricity, magnetism and mass. Similarly, the mathematical implication is that the 'consciousness field' is weaker per unit volume than the other fields but if consistent with the other fields, ranges across a larger volume of space than do the others. It may also have an underlying constant at s⁴/t⁵ analogous to K_g , suggesting a higher frequency.

    This mathematical view is not without parallel in the disciplines of philosophy and psychology, therein sometimes described as 'the spark of life' and 'the meeting of minds'. Another implication of the mathematics is that all life is connected with all other life, just as all mass is connected with all other mass via its reciprocal field, in the case of mass by the gravity field and in the case of life by the consciousness field. There is ample evidence every day to support the connection between life of different species, and between the same species on Earth. No-one likes to see their kitty run over, or their child either.

    The proposed mathematical congruity between life and the rest of the physics of the universe imply that life is a part of the universe rather than an exception to it, suggesting that it should be expected at some point to encounter life from other places and times. That may change the perspective that homo sapiens has of its own species and those other species which share the planet Earth. Communication via the 'consciousness field' may be a possibilty both intra and ex planet. There is anecdotal evidence of that.

    Another interesting question is why matter loses its fourth energy freedom after a defined passage of time and results in 'death', or a return of the physical state of life back to the state of mass. That there is a difference between mass and life can hardly be denied. The fourth degree of freedom may differ in its behaviour from the other space-time ratios, including the possibility that, perhaps like quantum waves, it may be sourced from time-space. The fourth energy freedom may not move through 'observable' space-time and may be analogous to the wave form moving through time-space, suggesting an explanation for a finite physical life span.

Table of Space-Time Units of Measure

                          MATTER                  Space Expansion ---->             VISIBLE UNIVERSE

0	s0	s1	s2	s3	s4	1/s	1/s2	1/s3	1/s4
t 0	s 0 t 0 singularity BIG BANG	s length, electric quantity (C)	s 2 area, magnetic quantity (W/m2)	s 3 volume, mass quantity (kg)	s 4 ?	1/s power (elec.mag. mass)	1/s2 ?	1/s3 ?	1/s4 ?
t1	t time	t s up quark	t s2 charm quark	t s3 top quark	t s4 gluon	t/s energy, work, electric charge	t/s2 force, electric potential, emf (Velec )	t/s3 elect field intensity (E)	t/s4 pressure
t2	t 2 ?	t 2 s down quark	t 2s2 strange quark	t 2s3 bottom quark	t 2s4 photon	t 2/s inertia	t 2/s 2 momentum, magnetic charge, electrical resistivity (ρ)	t 2/s 3 electric resistance (R), magnetic potential, mmf (Vmag )	t 2/s 4 magnetic field intensity (H)
t3	t 3 ?	t 3s electron	t 3s2 muon	t 3s3 tau	t 3s4 Z-boson	t 3/s moment of inertia	t 3/s2 ?	t 3/s3 mass charge	t 3/s4 magnetic resistance (μ), mass potential, massmf (Vmass)
t4	t 4 ?	t 4s electron nutrino	t 4s2 muon nutrino	t 4s3 tau nutrino	t 4s4 W-boson	t 4/s ?	t 4/s2 ?	t 4/s3 ?	t 4/s4 life charge (?)
1/t	1/t frequency 1 freedom υ	s/t speed, elec.current Ielec, Efield	s 2/t Hawking radiation (RH) (?)	s 3/t ?	s 4/t ?	1/ ts	1/ ts2	1/ ts3	1/ ts4
1/t2	1/t2 frequency 2 freedom (?)	s/t2 Δ speed, acceleration KE = Eυ 9.487 x 1033	s 2/t2 magnetic current Imag, Bfield electrical concuctivity (σ)	s 3/t2 ?	s 4/t2 ?	1/ t2s	1/ t2s2	1/ t2s3	1/ t2s4
1/t3	1/t3 frequency 3 freedom (?)	s/t3 Δ accel.,	s 2/t3 KB = Bυ  2.846x1042	s 3/t3 gravity mass current Imass, gfield	s 4/t3 ?	1/ t3s positron	1/ t3s2	1/ t3s3	1/ t3s4
1/t4	1/t4 ?	s/t4 ?	s 2/t4 ?	s 3/t4 Kg = gυ 8.538x1050	s 4/t4 consciousness life current Ilife (?)	1/ t4s	1/ t4s2	1/ t4s3	1/ t4s4

Time                              VISIBLE UNIVERSE                                       ANTI-MATTER
↓ Expansion

PHYSICS: The Constants, old and new

The fundamental constants which Planck proposed are based upon the physics of free space rather than any contrived unit of measure are:

Name                    Symbol            Value                   SI unit                         Space-Time unit

Planck constant         h         1.054 x 10^-34                J.s                                  t²/s (inertia)

Coulomb constant     k_e       1.054 x 10⁹                 kg m³ s^-2 C^-2                    t/s² (voltage, force)

Boltzmann's constant k_B       1.380 x 10^-23              J K^-1                                t/s (elec.chg,energy)

Speed of light           c          2.997 x 10⁸                 m/s                                  s/t (speed)

Gravitational constant G       6.67 x 10^-11                 m³ kg^-1 s^-2                      s⁶/t⁵ ( makes no sense)

(a) The Planck constant, is known as the 'quantum of action' which means that it is the smallest quantity of (vectorial) motion which can be applied to a mass. There is no further division of that 'action' into smaller parts, which is what the word 'quantum' implies. The space-time unit for h is t²/s, which is the unit for inertia and at magnitude 10^-34 is extremely small and at the level affecting fundamental particles. The Planck constant links Energy to Frequency, (E = hυ), in S-T units t/s = t²/s x 1/t = t/s ; Frequency to the Speed of light, (υ = c/λ) in S-T units 1/t = s/t x 1/s = 1/t ; Wavelength to Momentum, ( λ = h/p) in S-T units s = t²/s / t²/s² = t²/s x s²/t² = s. The S-T units are again entirely consistent with the SI units.

(b) The Coulomb constant is the 'quantum voltage' which applies between charges on fundamental particles such as the electron or positron. (The electron can exist without an electric charge, s, within a conductor and in that case may carry magnetic charge, s².) The charge can exist without the electron when it is a 'static' charge, perhaps attached to an atom, which does not move through the conductor. Synthetic clothing is a good example. Charge is described as a 'scalar motion' which can attach to a particle. It is the charge 'motion' which moves through a conductor as a current rather than the particle. An electron cannot 'escape' from a conductor unless it carries a charge, which enables it to move through space. The charge gives the electron the ability to move through space either within or from a conductor. The space-time unit for C is t/s² which is volts.

(c) The Boltzmann constant relates to the laws of thermodynamics, and is the 'quantum energy' relating to the motion of atoms and molecules which is manifested as heat, or temperature in degrees Kelvin. The space-time unit for k_B is t/s which is energy.

(d) The Speed of Light is the maximum limit to velocity which can be achieved by a particle possessing mass or momentum. It is the constant which relates mass to its energy equivalent. The constant c has the space-time unit s/t which is speed. For further observations on c refer below.

(e) The Gravitational constant relates the acceleration between two masses which is powered by the gravitational field. It is calculated from scientific observation and applies not as a fundamental quantity. The fundamental underlying equation is F = ma, where the 'a' equals Gm'/r². G relates the observed results to the fundamental equation. G has no space-time units which make sense.

Three of these constants define 'quantum quantities' which means the smallest possible amount ( h, C, k_B) The fourth defines the maximum limit (c). The only anomaly in Planck's five constants is G which probably does not belong there. That error arises from science's long history of misconception of the nature of gravity. It may be more appropriate to instead include the quantum of matter which, from Table 1 is 'ts' (= st) or what is presently known as the 'up-quark', if Table 1 has correctly identified the 'ts' particle. This has yet to be confirmed.

The Derivation of Frequency Constants

The above discussion of the Constants and the quantum physics equations, much of which can be credited to Max Planck's work, open further consideration of the electro-magnetic-gravity relationship and where they belong in the electromagnetic radiation spectrum. As far as is known by this author, there has not been a consideration that these fields may have a frequency. The highest known frequencies are associated with gamma radiation, which is of the order of 10²⁵ Hz. The current electro-magnetic spectrum does not look beyond gamma radiation.

The equations relevant are E_nergy = mc², E = hυ, υ = c/λ and λ = h/ρ. The Space-Time (S-T) units (Table 1) can be used to confirm the validity of the equations used to calculate the Frequency Constants. The three fields compared are the electric (E) field, the magnetic (B) field and the gravity (g) field.

                                   E field                              B field                                g field

Equation                   E_field = 1/mc²                     B_field = 1/mc                          g_field = 1/m

                                       = 1/hυ                                = c/hυ                                  = c²/hυ

S-T unit            s/t = (t³/s³ x s²/t²)^-1 = s/t    s²/t² = (t³/s³ x s/t)^-1 = s²/t²     s³/t³ = (t³/s³)^-1 = s³/t³ equations check    = (t²/s x 1/t)^-1 = s/t                 = s/t (t²/s x 1/t)^-1 = s²/t²        = s²/t²(t²/s 1/t)^-1 = s³/t³

All correct

Sub value for h,c E = 1/hυ = 1/1.054x10^-34υ B = c/hυ = 3x10⁸/1.054x10^-34υ g= c²/hυ = 9x10¹⁶/1.054x10^-34υ

              Eυ = 9.487x10³³ = K_E          Bυ = 2.846 x10⁴² = K_B            gυ = 8.538 x 10⁵⁰ = K_g

The constants allow the calculation of the frequency and wavelength of, for example the gravitational fields of the Earth and the Sun, which vary with the gravitational field strength.

Freq'cy υ_{g earth} = K_g /g_earth = 8.538x10⁵⁰/ 9.8 = 8.712x10⁴⁹Hz and Wavelength λ_{g earth} = 3.443x10^-42 m.

υ_{g sun} = K_g /g_sun = 8.538x10⁵⁰/ 274 = 3.116x10⁴⁸Hz and wavelength λ_{g sun} = 9.646x10^-41 m.

The mathematics indicate that the smaller the acceleration of matter through the gravity field, the higher the the frequency of the gravity field, and therefore the higher the energy of the gravity field. This counter-intuitive result supports the validity of the equation mg = 1. It is a high mass charge which increases matter acceleration, not a high gravity field value. The constant K_g underlies a (variable) gravitation frequency many orders of magnitude higher than gamma radiation. This may help explain the large reach of the gravity field compared to the other fields, given also that the gravity field is scalar motion (speed, s/t) in three degrees of freedom, the x, y and z axes. These do not denote a position in space, but denote an orientation relationship between the axes relative to each other.

PHYSICS: An idea worth further thought is that the wave form of the fundamental particles are sourced in time-space, the mathematical reciprocal of space-time, wherby motion is through time rather than through space. Such a possibility would help explain the quantum physics puzzles, where a particle has multiple statistical spatial possibilities rather than a sharply focussed place in a spacial location, making it difficult to observe and measure in space-time, from where we make our observations. The wave domain may belong in time-space and the particle domain in space-time. There is nothing apparent in the mathematics of Table 1 in Theoria Omnia which determines that interpretation as not possible. The challenge that this possibility presents to mathematics is that st ≠ ts . If 's' is known, then 't' is not and if 't' is known then 's' is not.

MJB 2010. Acrylic 18" x 24"