Saturday 11 April 2015

Gravity Field Frequency - (not for the armchair Physicists without an understanding of Maths)

The G field floods the vast expanses of space-time with its energy of motion, reciprocal to the relatively concentrated static energy that is mass. One is interchangeable with the other.
Frequency Constants of the Electric, Magnetic and Gravity Fields
M. J. Bull 2015
The quantum physics equations and the variously derived constants, many of which can be credited to Max Planck's work, suggest that further consideration of the electric, magnetic and gravity fields, their inter-relationship, and exploration of where they belong in the electromagnetic radiation frequency spectrum may be illuminating.

(The mathematical and experimental proof of the E-M-G connection is outlined in a previous paper titled 'New Physics – The Relationship between Gravity, Mass, Magnetism and Electricity' to be found at michaeljbull.blogspot.com.au , or on Academia.edu titled 'Mass, Gravity and Unity', researched and written by this author.)

As far as is known by this author, there has not been any published scientific consideration that these E-M-G fields may have a frequency. The highest known frequencies are associated with gamma radiation, which is of the order of 1025 Hz. The current electromagnetic spectrum does not look beyond gamma radiation.

The equations relevant are E = mc2, E = hυ, υ = c/λ and λ = h/ρ.

The Space-Time (S-T) units (see Appendix 1 and 2 of the above mentioned paper) can be used to confirm the validity of the equations used to calculate the Frequency Constants. The three fields compared are the electric (E) field, the magnetic (B) field and the gravity (G) field. ( Note that the G field and acceleration g are different)

                                      E field                                  B field                               G field
Equation                        Efield = 1/mc2                    Bfield = 1/mc                     Gfield = 1/m
                                                 = 1/hυ                                  = c/hυ                                  = c2/hυ

S-T unit                      s/t = (t3/s3 x s2/t2)-1 = s/t                s2/t2 = (t3/s3 x s/t)-1 = s2/t2                    s3/t3 = (t3/s3)-1 =s3/t3         equations check         = (t2/s x 1/t)-1 = s/t                  = s/t (t2/s x 1/t)-1 = s2/t2                      = s2/t2(t2/s x1/t)-1 = s3/t3
All correct ( Note the Planck Constant, h, unit of measure is J.sec., a unit of Inertia – see above mentioned Paper)

Sub. value for h,c E = 1/hυ = 1/1.054x10-34υ B = c/hυ = 3x108/1.054x10-34υ G= c2/hυ = 9x1016/1.054x10-34υ
(where h = ħ , value of the reduced Planck constant and c = speed of light)



    Eυ = 9.487x1033 = KE              Bυ = 2.846 x1042 = KB             Gυ = 8.538 x 1050 = KG

The constants (KE, B and G) allow the calculation of the frequency and wavelength of, for example, the gravitational fields of the Earth and the Sun, which vary with the gravitational field strength.
Frequency
 υG earth = KG /gearth = 8.538x1050/ 9.8 = 8.712x1049Hz and Wavelength λG earth = 3.443x10-42 m.
υG sun = KG /gsun = 8.538x1050/ 274 = 3.116x1048Hz and wavelength λG sun = 9.646x10-41 m.
A maths validity check of these equations is c = υ/λ, both equations approximate 3 x 108 = c

The mathematics indicate that the smaller the acceleration of matter through the gravity field, the higher the frequency of the gravity field, and therefore the higher the energy of the gravity field. This counter-intuitive result supports the validity of the equation Gm = 1 (or G = 1/m), and validates this author's interpretation of Inertia as an energy and its reciprocal, Acceleration, as a motion. That is observable in the gravitational vortex which is a galaxy, (and exceeds observation in the black hole at its centre). The mathematics indicate that F = g/G, so, F (or acceleration of mass) decreases as the G field increases and as Inertia increases, again, counter intuitive under current accepted physics thought. The equation G = 1/m suggests that the G field is higher in areas of less mass. In other words, in the 'vacant' areas of space-time the G field (motion) is higher than in areas of higher mass energy (static energy). The same phenomenon is observable in the E field, which is a one dimensional analogue, and where static charge on capacitor plates is reduced to zero when current (motion) between them flows. This may have profound implications for current cosmology theory.

The constant KG underlies a (variable) gravitation frequency many orders of magnitude higher than gamma radiation. This may help explain the vast reach of the gravity field compared to the other fields, given also that the gravity field is scalar motion (speed, s/t) in three degrees of freedom, the x, y and z axes and written in S-T units s3/t3 . These do not denote a position in space, but denote an orthogonal orientation between the axes relative to each other. The G field floods the vast expanses of space-time with its energy of motion, reciprocal to the relatively concentrated static energy that is mass. One is interchangeable with the other.

Our thinking needs to expand to solve the riddles of the cosmos.

No comments:

Post a Comment