Wednesday 28 October 2015

Physics - INERTIA, the missing clue







Inertia has long been misunderstood and ignored by Physics, with no concept of its importance to many other areas of study, including Time, the Gravity field, Dark Energy and Acceleration. The following is extracted from works written by this author to illustrate the point.


1.   It is often seen in current mainstream physics thought, the concept of the fourth dimension being synonymous with Time. To this author's knowledge there is no published basis for this assumption supported by research and experiment. The concept of time in the preceding Papers 1 to 4 by this author support the concept of Time as being the same as Space in its dimensions, and along with space, constituting space-time. Time's interaction with space creates the ratios which represent the quantities of physics (refer to the Table of Space-Time Units in section 6).

2. Verification of the Equation for Time, using Quantum Values.
The equation derived in Paper 1, section 2, being a Newtonian type equation for Time is
t = ( m r / F ) and is consistent with space-time units of measurement. That equation can be further reduced to a simpler form involving distance (r) and inertia (ί) using Newton's second law of motion and the derivation of the correct unit of measure for inertia (refer Paper 1, section 1) by this author.
t = ( mr/ ma)
= ( r/a)½
= (r ί)½
which in English says Time equals the square root of (distance times inertia).
To check that this equation is correct, quantum values, ( q ), can be inserted for each algebraic letter and calculations done to ensure that the result is numerically correct. All units of measure must be consistent and the quanta in space-time units of measure have been previously calculated in Paper 3, Table of Energies and Table of Motions.
In space time units, the above equation is written

Tq = ( Sq x ίq )½
= ( 1.616199 x 10-35 x 1.798266 x 10-54 )½
= ( 2.906356 x 10-89 )½
= ( 29.06356 x 10-88 )½
= 5.391063 x 10-44 sec.
= Tq , exactly as calculated by Planck as the quantum of Time.

The above proves beyond reasonable doubt that the equation for Time is correct, and also that this author's interpretation of Inertia is correct. Note that Inertia is an energy quite different to Mass energy, contrary to its treatment in many physics text books currently in use.

3. The Dimensions of Time
The Table of Space-Time Units of Measure (section 6) , itself verifiable from SI units of measure (Paper 1, Appendix 2), clearly shows that Time transitions, along with Space, into at least the three dimensions which can be perceived by humans. It is demonstrated by velocity, a linear or orbital one dimensional Motion, S/T; through magnetic current (B-field), S2/T2, a quantity relating to area (S2 ) in two dimensions; to gravity (G-field), S3/T3, a quantity relating to volume (S3 ) in three dimensions. The Energies have a similar relationship to Time in its 3 dimensions demonstrated by Energy T/S, Magnetic Energy T2/S2 to Mass Energy T3/S3. The relationship between the three-dimensional energies and motions is orthogonal and means that in SI units of measure, Mass = Energy3 which Einstein originally pointed out in his own notation, being E = mc2. The mathematics suggest that Time, along with Space, proceeds through higher dimensions which modern humans, in the main, do not perceive or recognise. Observation beyond three dimensions is therefore limited, but mathematics does not experience those limitations and indicate that Time and Space exist beyond the third dimension by logical extension.

4. Time and Inertia
The verification of the Time / Inertia equation in 2. above allows an analysis of that equation to become more than just speculation. The equation is easier to consider if the form T2 = S ί is used to avoid square roots. The obvious is that ί = T2/S, which is the space-time unit of measure for inertia. The space-time measure is not only a unit of measure, it defines inertia numerically. The second is S = T2/ ί , which states that length (or distance) is a function of time and inertia. As inertia is reciprocal to acceleration, this equation can be written S = a T2 which is confirmed by the similar Newtonian equation S = u T + ½ a T2, where u is initial velocity. If initial velocity were zero then the two equations are the same if the constant of integration, ½ , is ignored. This is further evidence that the energy (inertia), and the motion (acceleration), are reciprocal, as stated in Paper 1, section 1.
It is not intuitively obvious that either inertia or mass are energies, which may be why current physics does not recognise that it is so and has no credible explanation for either quantity. The mathematically closely related magnetic energy from a permanent magnet is readily observable as an energy and is the two dimensional analogue of mass energy.

5. Time and Space
While most have no trouble conceptualising Space, that is not the case for Time. It appears to most as something invisible which passes in only one direction and defines physical change, such as age, speed, entropy or order, for example. Time is far more than these concepts, and at the same time it is less. Time, without Space, has no comprehensible meaning of itself, but with Space it defines everything, including, for example, motion and energy. It may be that a phenomenon represented by Time of itself remains yet to be discovered.
Space, however, has a meaning of itself without Time as exemplified by the electric charge which has the S-T unit of S. A charge moving through a conductor is a case of Space moving through Matter, which is mathematically the same as Matter moving though Space.
The Table of Space-Time (section 6) shows the role of Space-Time in up to four dimensions. It is known that the ratios of Time to Space and Space to Time define the Energies and Motions of all known and unknown related quantities. (It is unproven whether or not the Space-Time products define the sub atomic particles, as Matter and Anti-matter.)

It is true that Time can be measured, but that measure is always related to a physical process which involves Space. The reciprocal of Time 1/T, which is frequency, is also a measure meaningless without relating it to Space. Frequency is often used as a measure of wave energy and in so doing relates to the energy which is defined by Time and Space, T/S. To clarify this concept, in the mechanical system an analogy is acceleration as a measure of the change in velocity, denoted S/T2 which is velocity S/T times frequency 1/T which equals S/T2. The 1/T is dependent upon the S in velocity to have meaning. To summarise the above, Time does not have meaning without Space, and as such is not on its own a meaningful entity, at least not within the current conceptual capability of humans.












6.
Table of Space-Time Units of Measure.
                          MOTION                          SPACE EXPANSION                            MATTER
S4/T4
?
S4/T3
?
S4/T2
?
S4/T
?
S4
?
S4
S4
?


TS4
gluon
T2S4
photon
T3S4
Z-boson
T4S4
W-boson
S3/T4
?
S3/T3
mass current
GRAVITY
S3/T2
?
S3/T
?
S3
volume

S3
S3
volume

TS3
top quark
T2S3
bottom quark
T3S3
tau
T4S3
tau neutrino
S2/T4
?
S2/T3
?
S2/T2
magnetic current
S2/T
?
S2
area

S2
S2
area
TS2
charm quark
T2S2
strange quark
T3S2
muon
T4S2
muon neutrino
S/T4
?
S/T3
Δ accel,
S/T2
Δ speed,
accel.
S/T
speed,
elec current
S
distance,
elec charge capacitance C

S1
S
distance,
elec charge
capacitance C
TS
up quark
T2S
down quark
T3S
electron
T4S
electron neutrino
1/T4
?

1/T3
?

contraction
1/T2
?

of time
1/T
frequency


S0/T0 = 1
Unity
MOTION


S0
T0 S0 = 1
Unity
MATTER

T
time


T2
?

expansion
T3
?

of time
T4
?

T - 4
T - 3
T - 2
T - 1
T0
O
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
1/T4
?
1/T3
?
1/T2
?
1/T
frequency
1/T0 S0 = 1
Unity
ANTI-MATTER

S0
T0/S0 = 1
Unity
ENERGY
T
time
T2
?
T3
?
T4
?
1/T4S
anti electron neutrino
1/T3S
anti electron (positron)
1/T2S
anti down quark
1/TS
anti up quark
1/S
power

S-1
1/S
power


T/S
energy
electric energy
T2/S
inertia
T3/S
moment of inertia
T4/S
?
1/T4S2
anti muon neutrino
1/T3S2
anti muon
1/T2S2
anti strange quark
1/TS2
anti charm quark
1/S2
?

S-2
1/S2
?


T/S2
force,
elect potential V
T2/S2
momentum
magnetic energy
elec resistivity σ
T3/S2
?
T4/S2
?
1/T4S3
anti tau neutrino
1/T3S3
anti tau
1/T2S3
anti bottom quark
1/TS3
anti top quark
1/S3
?

S-3
1/S3
?


T/S3
elect field intensity E
T2/S3
elec resis R
magnetic potential
T3/S3
MASS
energy
T4/S3
?
1/T4S4
anti W-boson
1/T3S4
anti Z-boson
1/T2S4
anti photon
1/TS4
anti gluon
1/S4
?

S-4
1/S4
?


T/S4
pressure
T2/S4
magnetic intensity H
T3/S4
mag resist μ
T4/S4
?
                   ANTI – MATTER                 SPACE CONTRACTION                  ENERGY
Ratios marked ? are unknown to current physics and are predicted to exist as quantities yet to be defined and researched by science.